bug#62000: closed (Inconsistent indentation rules for define-configuration)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:40:00 +0100
with message-id <826c18cf-3920-ba04-c7b6-f95ff0f88310@makinata.eu>
and subject line Re: Inconsistent indentation rules for define-configuration
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62000,
regarding Inconsistent indentation rules for define-configuration
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
62000: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62000
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Inconsistent indentation rules for define-configuration
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 6 Mar 2023 12:48:56 +0000
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0
>
>
>
>
> Suspected file: .dir-locals.el
>
>
> Using 'package' as a field in define-configuration results in inconsistent 
> indentation:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (define-configuration/no-serialization mympd-configuration
>   (package
>     (file-like mympd)        ;;;; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< notice how it's 
> indented with 2 spaces
>     "The package object of the myMPD server."
>     empty-serializer)
>
>   (shepherd-requirement
>    (list-of-symbol '())      ;;;; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< vs 1 space
>    "This is a list of symbols naming Shepherd services that this service
> will depend on."
>    empty-serializer)
>
> ;; ...
> )
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: Inconsistent indentation rules for define-configuration
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:40:00 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
>
>
>
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2023-03-07 14:02, Simon Tournier wrote:
> > I am missing something but from my point of view, it would not be
> > possible to change what you are suggesting: apply indentation rules
> > depending on the context
> Thanks for the explanation, am closing this then.
>
>
> -- 
> Furthermore, I consider that nonfree software must be eradicated.
>
> Cheers,
> Bruno.
>
>
> --- End Message ---