--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-chatgpt-shell. |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jul 2023 17:52:58 +0200 |
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-chatgpt-shell): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
index d7e45fffc6..b26ebe64b1 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
@@ -490,6 +490,25 @@ (define-public emacs-gptel
API key.")
(license license:gpl3+)))
+(define-public emacs-chatgpt-shell
+ (package
+ (name "emacs-chatgpt-shell")
+ (version "0.74.1")
+ (source (origin
+ (method git-fetch)
+ (uri (git-reference
+ (url "https://github.com/xenodium/chatgpt-shell")
+ (commit "1de7bfa6a34f20cca813006282d9a8f2ef291f95")))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "1rabpp70qlmc47lmp2v7ckvfjhy6wkk881fxpbv2dchzhn77qk5r"))))
+ (build-system emacs-build-system)
+ (home-page "https://github.com/xenodium/chatgpt-shell")
+ (synopsis "ChatGPT and DALL-E Emacs shells + Org Babel")
+ (description
+ "chatgpt-shell is a comint-based ChatGPT shell for Emacs.")
+ (license license:gpl3+)))
+
(define-public emacs-geiser-guile
(package
(name "emacs-geiser-guile")
base-commit: e43cbeafd1b632f39b08b3644af5230d5350a656
--
2.41.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#64958] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-chatgpt-shell. |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Sep 2023 12:31:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 |
Am Montag, dem 31.07.2023 um 22:03 +0200 schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler:
> Am Sonntag, dem 30.07.2023 um 22:51 +0200 schrieb Wojtek Kosior:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-chatgpt-shell): New variable.
> >
> > Doesn't this package effectively recommend a nonfree
> > service-as-a-software-substitute? It'd be better to keep users away
> > from such "services". Also, sorry to say, I'm pretty sure this is
> > against the Free Software Distribution Guidelines
> IANAL, but as far as I understand, having clients for various
> "services" out there, even if those services are not distributed as
> free software, is permissible. See some social networking
> applications or messengers. IMHO, we would need a clear guideline
> for all of them rather than singling out ChatGPT even if using it is
> harmful for everyone involved.
>
> Nicolas, Andrew, WDYT?
Got two ayes, so pushed.
Cheers
--- End Message ---