bug#66928: closed ([PATCH 2/2] Update names to match the docstring)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:24 -0500
with message-id <jwvpm0eu1zn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#66928: [PATCH 2/2] Update names to match the docstring
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66928,
regarding [PATCH 2/2] Update names to match the docstring
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
66928: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66928
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Update names to match the docstring Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2023 12:49:27 +0000

Tags: patch

Hello

I noticed that for the function below the docstring doesn't match the
arg names.  I've chosen to keep the docstring on the basis that it may
be what has been the most visible for a time, and update the names in
the code.

In general, is it TRT?  Do we have a convention to keep names or the
docstring.  Please let me know if this patch is useful in its current
form or a change is needed.

thanks
Jeremy 

0002-Update-names-to-match-the-docstring.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#66928: [PATCH 2/2] Update names to match the docstring
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:24 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> > I noticed that for the function below the docstring doesn't match the
> > arg names.  I've chosen to keep the docstring on the basis that it may
>
> This is now fixed, closing,
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---