|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#66241: closed (30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files) |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:09:01 +0000 |
Your message dated Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:08:12 -0800 with message-id <CADwFkm=8F+4XkvsgGKPaAe-zepjA5TJP8Y26JjKyXEZ+0UtFSQ@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Re: bug#66241: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66241, regarding 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 66241: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66241 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 18:44:58 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) See patch for the rationale.0001-Use-auth-info-mode-for-non-hidden-authinfo-and-netrc.patch
Description: Text Data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#66241: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Use auth-info-mode for non-hidden authinfo and netrc files Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:08:12 -0800 Version: 30.1 Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 at 19:34, Stefan Kangas wrote: > >> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> See patch for the rationale. >> >> Thanks. Could you explain why you think that this should this be the >> default value, instead of merely a user customization? > > The user customization is indeed rather easy: one can add a "-*- mode:" > comment at the top of the file. The main issue with that is that the > user needs to be aware of the existence of the mode. I wasn't, until > recently. > > The second point is, I see no potential for false-positives, i.e., who > would have a file name "authinfo" or "netrc" that is not a credentials > file? (Of course this is just a theory which can be disputed.) Thanks, that makes sense. So I installed this patch on master (c12166de380). I'm closing this bug report.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |