--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
:box vertical bar artifacts at 'display boundaries |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:50:31 -0400 |
I have identified a display bug related to placing :box face parameters within
'display strings. Disable font-lock mode in *scratch* and evaluate:
(insert "\n"
(propertize " " 'display (propertize " " 'face '(:box t)))
(propertize "middle" 'face '(:box t))
(propertize " " 'display (propertize " " 'face '(:box t))))
So far so good: the box is correctly merged across all three elements and wraps
around them. But now move point within and across the displayed boxed text.
Internal vertical divisions bars separating the 'display and normal :box
regions appear.
If you add a face box property to the blank flanking strings as well, this
prevents the internal boundary from appearing.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#70637: :box vertical bar artifacts at 'display boundaries |
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2024 12:17:44 +0300 |
> From: JD Smith <jdtsmith@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 13:16:54 -0400
> Cc: 70637@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > On May 11, 2024, at 5:41 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> >> From: JD Smith <jdtsmith@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 09:31:28 -0400
> >> Cc: 70637@debbugs.gnu.org
> >>
> >> I presume this is a more general issue than just :box. One idea is to add
> >> a warning to the Elisp section "Display
> >> Specs That Replace The Text", perhaps at the end:
> >>
> >> Note: certain `face' attributes such as `:box' can lead to display
> >> artifacts when applied to the replacing
> >> text in a `display' specification. These attributes may be incorrectly
> >> merged with adjacent non-`display'
> >> `face' properties. This can be mitigated by applying the `face'
> >> attributes directly to the text being
> >> replaced, rather than (or in addition to) the `display' replacement text
> >> itself.
> >
> > Actually, this is specific to :box, since only for that attribute we
> > need to determine the beginning and the end of the box.
> >
> >> Maybe a bit too wordy.
> >
> > Yes, I agree. If you can reword it to be specific to :box and to
> > include an example, I think it would be good.
>
>
> Feel free to edit:
Thanks, I installed a variant of this, and I'm therefore closing this
bug.
--- End Message ---