--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:20:21 +0200 (CEST) |
After a few more attempts guix pull was successful. I don't know what happened,
I think it was still right to report it.
--
Jun 17, 2024, 23:41 by danclm@tutanota.com:
> Hi Guix,
> I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an older
> generation):
>
> build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv
> failed
> hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling
> from, or some incompatibility among them. You can check the build log
> and report the issue to the channel developers.
>
> The channels you are pulling from are: guix.
>
> View build log at
> '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv.gz'.
> cannot build derivation
> `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv': 1 dependencies
> couldn't be built
> guix pull: error: build of
> `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-profile.drv' failed
>
> (repl-version 0 1 1)
> Generating package cache for
> '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m-profile'...
>
> Backtrace:
> In gnu/packages.scm:
> 439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 460:18 18 (fold #<procedure expand-cache expr> _ _)
> In gnu/packages.scm:
> 399:37 17 (expand-cache . _)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1411:17 16 (supported-package? #<package acpi-call-linux-module@1?> ?)
> In guix/memoization.scm:
> 101:0 15 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package acpi?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1381:14 14 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 460:18 13 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa6de0 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
> 101:0 11 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package dwar?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1381:14 10 (_)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 460:18 9 (fold #<procedure 7ffff4aa7d20 at guix/packages.scm:13?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1385:44 8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> In guix/memoization.scm:
> 101:0 7 (_ #<hash-table 7fffe4f30ea0 1780/3517> #<package libb?> ?)
> In guix/packages.scm:
> 1389:39 6 (_)
> 1651:16 5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
> 1755:47 4 (thunk)
> In gnu/packages/linux.scm:
> 9981:25 3 (native-inputs #<package libbpf@1.4.1 gnu/packages/linu?>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1685:16 2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> 1780:13 1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-vari?>)
> In unknown file:
> 0 (backtrace #<undefined>)
>
> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (value
> (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f))
>
> Thank you,
> Best regards
>
> --
>
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#71626: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:27:56 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hello,
danclm--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> writes:
> After a few more attempts guix pull was successful. I don't know what
> happened, I think it was still right to report it.
An erroneous commit made "guix pull" fail. The problem was fixed a few
hours after having been introduced. Unfortunately, you guix pulled
during the time frame it was still present.
Now, everything is in order again. Sorry for the inconvenience!
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
--- End Message ---