--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: ibus-minimal: Graft to 1.5.29. |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jun 2024 09:18:20 +0200 |
This fixes an issue, where IBus was not able to query emoji lists.
See also <https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/2476>.
* gnu/packages/ibus.scm (ibus-minimal/fixed): New variable.
(ibus-minimal): Add ibus-minimal/fixed as replacement.
---
gnu/packages/ibus.scm | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/ibus.scm b/gnu/packages/ibus.scm
index c821279bd3..a2775b2f84 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ibus.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/ibus.scm
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ (define-module (gnu packages ibus)
(define-public ibus-minimal
(package
(name "ibus")
+ (replacement ibus-minimal/fixed)
(version "1.5.27")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
@@ -279,6 +280,23 @@ (define-public ibus
(package-native-search-paths ibus-minimal)))
(properties (alist-delete 'hidden? (package-properties ibus-minimal)))))
+(define-public ibus-minimal/fixed
+ ;; Fixes <https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/2476>.
+ ;; Ungraft on gnome-team, core-updates or a dedicated ungrafing branch.
+ (package
+ (inherit ibus-minimal)
+ (version "1.5.29")
+ (source (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append "https://github.com/ibus/ibus/"
+ "releases/download/"
+ version "/ibus-" version ".tar.gz"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0vjybn3xq5sz616fdy21f5c4b4ajrj4wmfnbjqz6584xw887yiaa"))))
+ (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs ibus-minimal)
+ (prepend libdbusmenu)))))
+
(define-public ibus-libpinyin
(package
(name "ibus-libpinyin")
base-commit: 7770e4140cddd5dc9c9879cb2bfcbd6cd4de59a0
--
2.45.1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#71565] [PATCH] gnu: ibus-minimal: Graft to 1.5.29. |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:50:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 23.06.2024 um 22:13 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> > […] I might have been cargo-culting the -public part from other
>> > definitions. Are grafts typically not exported?
>>
>> Not thinking about CI shenanigans, I think it's more logical that
>> they be private, since we want the users to use the grafted package,
>> not the graft itself (although in the end the result should be the
>> same).
>
> You mean that users end up accidentally discovering and using the wrong
> ibus through CLI? I don't think that's an issue for ibus-minimal,
> though, since it's hidden anyway, and I do trust users who write the
> files to be sensible here.
>
> On that note, I think I remember a graft which had to be public to also
> fix issues in certain dependent packages. (I might have committed that
> one myself and IIRC, it was meson). Feel free to drop the -public part
> from the ibus graft though; I had pushed it without resolving this
> conversation.
No big deal, but a reminder that we should add some proper grafting
guidelines to our doc.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
--- End Message ---