bug#42423: closed (icedtea: JAVA_HOME)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 01 Nov 2024 08:16:07 -0800
with message-id <87a5ej6ibc.fsf@librehacker.com>
and subject line Re: bug#42423: icedtea: JAVA_HOME
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #42423,
regarding icedtea: JAVA_HOME
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
42423: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=42423
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> icedtea: JAVA_HOME
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:09:52 -0800
>
>
>
>
> Hi, I'm not going to pretend to be a Java expert, but I was trying to
> build and run a Java application, and had to set JAVA_HOME manually. It
> is my understanding from my research[1] that applications often will
> want JAVA_HOME set to the path to the java install directory. It would
> seem like it would be useful if Guix set that as well for the icedtea
> and icedtea:jdk package.
>
> If there are good reasons for that not to be, perhaps more
> knowledgeable individuals will explain it.
>
> One part I'm not quite sure about is what JAVA_HOME would be set to if
> both icedtea and icedtea:jdk were installed.
>
> [1] Many JAVA_HOME results in a Startpage.com search
>
> -- 
> Christopher Howard
> p: +1 (907) 374-0257
> w: https://librehacker.com
> social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker
> gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net)
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#42423: icedtea: JAVA_HOME
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 01 Nov 2024 08:16:07 -0800
>
>
>
>
> Looking at this bug report after a few years, the question doesn't seem worthy 
> of more attention. Closing my bug report.
>
> -- 
> Christopher Howard
>
>
> --- End Message ---