emacs-commit
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-commit] recuperation gratify


From: Susanna Ho
Subject: [Emacs-commit] recuperation gratify
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 08:44:34 -0000

And all mechanical progressis and must be in this direction. As I have pointed out,this is traceable to two main causes. Take for instance the transition from horses to motor vehicles. In fact, it is their special functionto do so. No human being ever wants to do anythingin a more cumbrous way than is necessary. But historic necessity, orrather the belief in it, has failed to survive Hitler. The oftenerone surrenders to it the tighter its grip becomes. Leisure tobecome more like Mr Beevers, presumably. And here you observe the huge contradiction whichis usually present in the idea of progress. But that attitude is becoming difficult and even unfashionable. Or thanthe labourer or peasant of any exclusively agricultural community now or inthe past. It is theauthentic voice of a large section of the modem world. The tools I use demand the minimum of skill. Hence the absurdity of thatpicture of Utopians saving their souls with fretwork. A world ofrabbits ruled by stoats would be nearer the mark. Every aspirin-eaterin the outer suburbs would echo it fervently. But that attitude is becoming difficult and even unfashionable. Why not let the machine do the work and the men go anddo something else. But whateverthey want to do, they will find that another machine has set them free fromthat. The tools I use demand the minimum of skill. The machine-civilization is to continue, but its products are to be shared out equally. You can have machines doing all the work or human beings doing allthe work, but you cant have both. And here you observe the huge contradiction whichis usually present in the idea of progress. But whateverthey want to do, they will find that another machine has set them free fromthat. It is far worse than useless to write Fascism off asmass sadism, or some easy phrase of that kind. And all mechanical progressis and must be in this direction. But it may be said, why not retain the machine and retain creativework? Thereis no reason to think that it will destroy itself or stop functioning ofits own accord. It is theauthentic voice of a large section of the modem world. The choice is not, as yet, between a human and an inhuman world. Cease to use your hands, and youhave lopped off a huge chunk of your conscious-ness. Half the stuffing is knocked out of them byone neat blow. You are at the same momentfuriously pressing forward and desperately holding back. Clearly I donot, in a sense, want to return to a simpler, harder, probablyagricultural way of life. And now consider againthose half-dozen men who were digging the trench for the water-pipe. But meanwhilethe machine is here, and its corrupting effects are almost irresistible.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]