[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defvar vs setqif..
From: |
D. Goel |
Subject: |
Re: defvar vs setqif.. |
Date: |
21 May 2002 09:18:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
> `defvar' without an initializer _never_ binds or sets the variable.
yeah i was confused.. i knew this was true for common-lisp.. But
don't know why i assumed that if 'foo is unbounded, then (defvar foo)
binds it to nil. i just checked the doc and that's untrue..
> In fact it shouldn't affect the variable at all, only
> meta-information about the variable.
thanks.
D <http://www.glue.umd.edu/~deego/>
--
Re: defvar vs setqif.., Richard Stallman, 2002/05/20
Re: defvar vs setqif.., Miles Bader, 2002/05/19