[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed? |
Date: |
27 May 2002 02:48:14 -0400 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
Emacs will support bidirectional display [...]
The current code in indent.c assumes that buffer positions increase
monotonically with screen positions. I'm not saying that you should do
my job of lifting that limitation, but please keep this in mind when you
design and code the new indent.c, so that changing it for bidi Emacs
would not be harder than it is today.
what makes it difficult to support this lifting, today? what makes supporting
that lifting difficult in general?
thi
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, (continued)
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/25
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/27
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/28
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/27