[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:15:35 -0600 (MDT) |
> Perhaps critical sections could set a flag that tells SCM_TICK not
> to really do anything.
Yes, but then we would have to admit that we don't support true
concurrent execution.
In Emacs we don't want to support true concurrent execution. It is
useful for Guile to provide convenient constructs for use in
applications that do not support true concurrent execution.
Applications that want true concurrent execution should not use
those constructs; perhaps you would get an error if you use them
in an application that allows concurrent execution.
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/02
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/15