[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:29:27 -0500 |
There is no strong reason, but one of the recent problem I came
across in this area is that process operations don't work properly during
dumping (the handling of sigchld is explicitly not turned on because
it can supposedly prevent unexec from working right).
That prevents byte-compiling ediff with temacs, for example, because
ediff runs `patch' (IIRC) while loading one of its .el files.
There can be a conditional to avoid running the program
if purify-flag is non-nil.
- Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x, (continued)
- Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/29
- Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/30
- Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/31
- Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Bug in shell.el: explicit-bash-args does not work for bash 1.x, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/31