[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gratuitous changes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: gratuitous changes |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:42:35 -0500 |
readable substitute in ?\t, so why don't we adopt a good and
arguably more readable substitute for ?\ , say, ?\s?
(string-to-char " ") would also work, and would avoid
the need for a change in Emacs.
- Re: gratuitous changes, (continued)
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Nick Roberts, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Edward O'Connor, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Miles Bader, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/07
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/04
- Re: gratuitous changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/05
- Re: gratuitous changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/05