[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Customize Rogue
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Customize Rogue |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:54:05 -0500 |
If one could rigorously enforce this, then that would be the absolute
ideal and there would be no need whatsoever for custom-setq,
set-activate or anything like it. The only problem is whether it is
possible to do that in practice.
I can see one possible purpose for a function that would be called
custom-setq: a way to set a customizable variable and tell Custom to
regard it as "set by Custom" rather than as "set outside of Custom".
It might be nice if Custom wrote out a series of custom-setq
calls into .emacs, one per variabl, rather than writing a single
sexp that sets all the variables.
- Re: Customize Rogue, (continued)
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/10
- Re: Customize Rogue, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/03/10
- Re: Customize Rogue, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/03/11
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/11
- Re: Customize Rogue, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/03/11
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/11
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Richard Stallman, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/03/12
- Re: Customize Rogue, Per Abrahamsen, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/03/13
- Re: Customize Rogue, David Masterson, 2003/03/12