[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements] |
Date: |
03 Dec 2003 13:31:55 +0200 |
> From: Harry Putnam <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:42:50 -0600
>
> Being an experienced programmer and developer may have left you with
> a much better idea of what to look for and how to do it.
Not really, especially when I work with a manual for a tool that I
don't use too regularly.
> But I have found consistently over the last several years that the
> `s' search requires less knowledge on my part to find what I need.
Good indexing should require even less knowledge. All you need is to
think about related words or phrases.
> If only one search method were allowed I'd opt for `s'.
Ah, but it's not the only method, so this is not the issue at point.
- Info enhancements, Juri Linkov, 2003/12/01
- Re: Info enhancements, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/12/02
- Re: Info enhancements, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/12/02
- Re: Info enhancements (was: Re: HTML as info format), Juri Linkov, 2003/12/02
- Re: Info enhancements, Reiner Steib, 2003/12/02
- `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements], Harry Putnam, 2003/12/03
- Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/03
- Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements], Harry Putnam, 2003/12/03
- Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements], Harry Putnam, 2003/12/03
- Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/03
- Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements], Harry Putnam, 2003/12/03
- Re: `s' (regex) search [was Re: Info enhancements], Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/04
Re: Info enhancements, Juri Linkov, 2003/12/03
Re: Info enhancements, Kim F. Storm, 2003/12/02
Re: Info enhancements, Juri Linkov, 2003/12/11