[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs? |
Date: |
04 Dec 2003 14:58:15 +0000 |
> So changing Emacs' scopes to lexical is a prerequisite for any
> meaningful attempt at multithreading, anyway.
Except that it's more important that Emacs uses dynamic scope than
multi-threading. Dynamic scope is _one_ of the reasons Emacs has been
sucessfull.
rms wrote a paper about the design of Emacs which, I think,
succesfully justifies the choice of dynamic scope:
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/emacs-paper.html
Nic
- Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, (continued)
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/02
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/03
- Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/03
- Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Kim F. Storm, 2003/12/04
- Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Nic Ferrier, 2003/12/04
- non-blocking sockets (was Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?), Nic Ferrier, 2003/12/04
- Re: non-blocking sockets (was Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?), Kim F. Storm, 2003/12/05
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/04
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/04
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/04
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/04
Re: Are there plans for a multi-threaded Emacs?, Ted Zlatanov, 2003/12/05