[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Info enhancements
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Info enhancements |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:11:13 -0500 |
> I must not have been clear. The format I meant is:
>
> * MENU-ENTRY-NAME: NODE-NAME. LINE_NUMBER. DESCRIPTION
>
> instead of Dave Gillespie's
>
> * MENU-ENTRY-NAME: NODE-NAME. DESCRIPTION. LINE_NUMBER.
Of those two, I think the latter is better because the line number
will be less intrusive.
However,
* MENU-ENTRY-NAME: NODE-NAME (LINE_NUMBER). DESCRIPTION
or something along those lines would be even better. This makes
it visible that the line number goes with the node name and that
the two together spec the location.
I chose parens for this example but that was arbitrary. I'm not
attached to that particular detail.
But what do you think about recording the locations of index entries
in the tag table? For example:
Something like this might be ok, depending on details, but it might
be a bigger change.
- Re: Info enhancements, (continued)
Re: Info enhancements, Karl Berry, 2003/12/04
- Re: Info enhancements, Robert J. Chassell, 2003/12/04
- Re: Info enhancements, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/06
- Re: Info enhancements, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/07
- Re: Info enhancements, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/07
- Re: Info enhancements, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/07
- Re: Info enhancements, Kai Grossjohann, 2003/12/07
- Re: Info enhancements, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/07
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/08
- Re: Info enhancements, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/08