[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Info enhancements
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Info enhancements |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:31:41 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:49:36 -0500
> From: address@hidden (Karl Berry)
>
> Most index entries (in most manuals) are long strings of
> human-readable text that it is not useful to xref.
Yes, it's typical for @cindex entries to be like that. Entries that
are just symbol names are mostly produced by @vindex and @findex.
> So I don't think it is "easy". The easy thing to do is accept the
> feaure Texinfo already provides for subnode positioning: anchors. It is
> more work for the authors in one way, but on the other hand it actually
> works.
I tend to agree that the decision whether to xref an index entry is a
human one, so @anchor is the solution.
- Re: Info enhancements, (continued)
- Re: Info enhancements, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/12/07
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/09
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/08
- Re: Info enhancements, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/12/09
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/10
- Re: Info enhancements, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/12/08
- Re: Info enhancements, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/12/08
- Re: Info enhancements, Richard Stallman, 2003/12/09
Re: Info enhancements, Karl Berry, 2003/12/06
Re: Info enhancements, Karl Berry, 2003/12/06
Re: Info enhancements, Karl Berry, 2003/12/06