Re: uidXXXXX instead of username in log entries

[Nick Roberts]

> > revision 1.5533
> > date: 2003/12/23 20:30:10;  author: uid67241;  state: Exp;  lines: +24 -0
> > *** empty log message ***

> Btw, was the log message really empty?  The usual practice is to use
> the ChangeLog entry (with the file name stripped) for the log message.

Since the revision number is 5533, this must be the log for the
ChangeLog. This normally is empty. Perhaps the usernames are stored on a
different machine and can't be looked up at the moment.

Nick