[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods]
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods] |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2004 21:13:00 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I fully agree with that general principle. But, for the
> current case, I'm not sure it is the right thing that
> erase-buffer signals such an error considering that it
> removes even the narrowing restriction.
> I think I partly misunderstood the problem. Is the problem that
> erase-buffer gets an error when there is read-only text in the buffer?
Yes.
> Maybe you're right that it should not get an error for that.
> However, consider the case of a Customize buffer. That has lots of
> read-only text, the idea being that the user should not be able to
> edit it. Should erase-buffer in a Customize buffer leave it empty?
> The result would be an undesirable confusion. We could respond to
> that by saying, "So don't do erase-buffer in a Customize buffer."
> Maybe that's right, but I am not sure.
I think "So don't do ..." is sufficient.
> So it seems to me that there are some cases where we want erase-buffer
> to get rid of read-only text silently, but not all cases. It seems
> better to change the callers, not change erase-buffer.
> If we eval this once,
> (display-message-or-buffer (propertize "abc\n\n" 'read-only t))
> That is clearly a bug, but I think the right fix is to change the
> caller here too.
Ok, I've just installed these changes in addition to fix of
describe-char.
2004-05-10 Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
* print.c (temp_output_buffer_setup): Bind inhibit-read-only and
inhibit-modification-hooks to t temporarily before calling
Ferase_buffer.
* xfns.c (x_create_tip_frame): Bind inhibit-read-only and
inhibit-modification-hooks to t temporarily before calling
Ferase_buffer.
* w32fns.c (x_create_tip_frame): Bind inhibit-read-only and
inhibit-modification-hooks to t temporarily before calling
Ferase_buffer.
But I still believe it is better to change erase-buffer
itself (perhaps it should delete all overlays too). Let's
discuss it after the next release.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: reverting CJK input methods, (continued)
- Re: reverting CJK input methods, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/01
- with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Richard Stallman, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/06
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Richard Stallman, 2004/05/07
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods],
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Richard Stallman, 2004/05/11
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], David Kastrup, 2004/05/11
- Re: with-output-to-temp-buffer [Re: reverting CJK input methods], Richard Stallman, 2004/05/12
- erase-buffer (was: with-output-to-temp-buffer), Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: erase-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: erase-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/11
- Re: erase-buffer (was: with-output-to-temp-buffer), David Kastrup, 2004/05/11
- Re: erase-buffer (was: with-output-to-temp-buffer), Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/11
- Re: erase-buffer (was: with-output-to-temp-buffer), Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/11