[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Years in copyright notices
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Years in copyright notices |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:42:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 03:13:47PM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> > The latest legal advice I got is that we should not drop the 19 or 20
> > from year numbers in copyright notices. There is no need to change
> > all the existing notices, but the year numbers we add should be
> > written in 4 digits.
>
> Why not do it properly if we are going to fix 04 -> 2004 anyway?
_Please_ do not do random `cleanups' if they're not really necessary; it
simply makes for more merge conflicts.
-Miles
--
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
-- Walter Hines Page
- Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/17
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/17
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/06/21
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/06/22
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/22
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Jan D., 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/24
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Miles Bader, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/23
- Re: Years in copyright notices, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/24