[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better)..
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).. |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:17:12 -0400 |
> This would do no harm, but mode-name is always supposed to be a string.
Why?
That's how it's defined and documented to be used.
Maybe after the release we could consider whether it is
a good idea to change this. For now, let's focus
on what needs to be done to make a good release.
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Stephan Stahl, 2004/07/12
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Stefan Monnier, 2004/07/12
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Richard Stallman, 2004/07/13
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., David Kastrup, 2004/07/13
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Stephan Stahl, 2004/07/14
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., David Kastrup, 2004/07/14
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Stephan Stahl, 2004/07/14
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Kim F. Storm, 2004/07/14
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Richard Stallman, 2004/07/15
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).., Stefan, 2004/07/14
- Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better)..,
Richard Stallman <=