[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defvaralias
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: defvaralias |
Date: |
Fri, 6 May 2005 10:43:23 -0500 (CDT) |
Nick Roberts wrote:
As Stefan has pointed out defvaralias has a symmetry in its arguments
Looking at the old message, I believe that what Stefan said is that in
defvaralias (unlike in `define-obsolete-variable-alias'), there are no
"old" and "new" variables or "obsolete" and "updated" variables.
(With which I agree.) But that is not the same as saying that there
is symmetry. The asymmetry in the relation is that one is the alias,
the other the base variable.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/05
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/05
- defvaralias, Nick Roberts, 2005/05/06
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/06
- Re: defvaralias, Nick Roberts, 2005/05/06
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/06
- Re: defvaralias, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: defvaralias, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/06
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/06
- Re: defvaralias, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/07
- Re: defvaralias, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/08
- Re: defvaralias, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/08