Re: Strange code in derived.el.

[Lute Kamstra]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> changes on related things.  Maybe you could explain the rationale
>> behind the test so that I can take that into account when I'm fixing
>> the derived modes?
>
> The additional check is only relevant when compiling unbundled packages
> (the bundled packages are never used with a different Emacs version).

But people compile packages with a new Emacs and then run them with an
old Emacs?  I thought we only try to support the other way around.

> So you shouldn't worry about it when modifying emacs/lisp/**/*.el files.

Ok.

Thanks,

  Lute.