[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:38:43 -0400 |
Is everybody happy with the names of the `make-obsolete*' and
`define-obsolete-*-alias' arguments?
The alias being created is called FUNCTION or VARIABLE, and the symbol
(or definition) being aliased, NEW. Now, I understand the rationale:
NEW because it is the new, shinier name.
I can see how this could be confusing. I suggest using names
OLD-OBSOLETE-NAME and CURRENT-RECOMMENDED-NAME.
- argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/12
- argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias, Nick Roberts, 2005/06/12
- Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/13
- Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/15
- Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/15
- Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias, Nick Roberts, 2005/06/15
- Re: argument names for define-obsolete-*-alias, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/15