[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups
From: |
Jérôme Marant |
Subject: |
CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)] |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:12:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> I've been recently in touch with Ilya Zakharevich (CPerl-mode author)
>>>> about Cperl-mode bugs I found in current version from Emacs CVS
>>>> trunk (version 5).
>>>
>>> Please post them here.
>
>> I will do. Last time I reported one, you told me perl-mode did not
>> have such a bug :-P
>
> But either you didn't mention or I didn't notice that the bug is also absent
> from the original cperl-mode.el. I'm not really interested in fixing
> cperl-mode bugs, but I do find it important that our local changes to
> cperl-mode don't add new bugs.
Hi,
I'm sorry for being very late on this issue.
After trying to reproduce all cperl-mode bugs from the Debian BTS,
it seems that most of them have been fixed in the CVS trunk, but
one which is a regression from the original CPerl-mode from
Ilya.
Could you please take care of this?
Thanks in advance.
Here is the bug report:
-------------------------------------------------
The following bug report seems to be fixed in 4.32 but I could
reproduce it with 5.0 from the Emacs CVS.
> From address@hidden Fri Nov 23 12:41:46 2001
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2001 18:41:46 +0000
Return-path: <address@hidden>
Received: from salmon.pepperfish.org [195.149.39.195]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 167LGi-0006Fb-00; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:41:44 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by salmon.pepperfish.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 167LGY-0001aw-00
for <address@hidden>; Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:41:34 +0000
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 18:41:34 +0000 (GMT)
From: Vivek <address@hidden>
X-X-Sender: <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Subject: emacs21-el: keyword highlighting bug in cperl-mode.el
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: address@hidden
Package: emacs21-el
Version: 21.1-2woody
Severity: normal
subroutine names which contain built in keywords/function-names
delimited by _ characters get highlighted incorrectly:
For example, in emacs20-el:
sub foo_print_desc ()
{
}
'foo_print_desc' gets highlighted in font-lock-function-name-face
whereas under emacs21-el the 'print' part gets highlighted in
cperl-nonoverridable-face and the foo_ and _desc parts don't get
any highlighting at all. (This may be a bug in emacs21, of course)
The emacs package is one I compiled from source on woody, but I didn't
make any changes to the source - the sid system here is down at the moment,
but it should be easy to check that the bug exists there too...
-------------------------------------------------
--
Jérôme Marant
- CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)],
Jérôme Marant <=
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/29
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Jérôme Marant, 2005/06/29
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Ilya Zakharevich, 2005/06/30
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Miles Bader, 2005/06/30
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Ilya Zakharevich, 2005/06/30
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Miles Bader, 2005/06/30
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Ilya Zakharevich, 2005/06/30
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Miles Bader, 2005/06/30
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Ilya Zakharevich, 2005/06/30
- Re: CPerl-mode bug [Re: Relation with package authors (CPerl-mode follow-ups)], Miles Bader, 2005/06/30