[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lists.texi
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
lists.texi |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:19:32 -0500 (CDT) |
I recommend the following changes to lists.texi and can install if
desired. In as far as spelling issues are concerned, `vs' seems to be
the standard abbreviation of `versus' and `indices' seems to be the plural
form of `index' consistently used in the Elisp manual.
In as far as the return value of `ring-insert-at-beginning' is
concerned, it definitely is _not_ OBJECT as currently documented in
the Elips manual. The return value is the _new_ length of the ring,
but this seems to be by accident, rather than by design. We could
either document the actual return value, change
`ring-insert-at-beginning' to really return OBJECT (does not seem
terribly useful to me) or say that the return value is not
significant. The patch below does the latter.
===File ~/lists.texi-diff===================================
*** lists.texi 17 Jun 2005 09:08:29 -0500 1.52
--- lists.texi 18 Jun 2005 16:58:45 -0500
***************
*** 715,721 ****
primitives @code{setcar} and @code{setcdr}. We call these ``destructive''
operations because they change existing list structure.
! @cindex CL address@hidden vrs @code{setcar}
@quotation
@findex rplaca
@findex rplacd
--- 715,721 ----
primitives @code{setcar} and @code{setcdr}. We call these ``destructive''
operations because they change existing list structure.
! @cindex CL address@hidden vs @code{setcar}
@quotation
@findex rplaca
@findex rplacd
***************
*** 1691,1697 ****
@end defun
@defun ring-p object
! This returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a ring.
@end defun
@defun ring-size ring
--- 1691,1697 ----
@end defun
@defun ring-p object
! This returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a ring, @code{nil} otherwise.
@end defun
@defun ring-size ring
***************
*** 1705,1725 ****
@defun ring-elements ring
This returns a list of the objects in @var{ring}, in no particular
! order.
@end defun
@defun ring-copy ring
This returns a new ring which is a copy of @var{ring}.
! The new ring contains the same objects as @var{ring}.
@end defun
@defun ring-empty-p ring
! This returns @code{t} if @var{ring} is empty.
@end defun
! The newest element in the ring always has index 0. Higher indexes
! correspond to older elements. Index @minus{}1 corresponds to the
! oldest element, @minus{}2 to the next-oldest, and so forth.
@defun ring-ref ring index
This returns the object in @var{ring} found at index @var{index}.
--- 1705,1728 ----
@defun ring-elements ring
This returns a list of the objects in @var{ring}, in no particular
! order. The length of that list is always the ring size. If the ring
! length is less than the ring size, the entries of the list that do not
! correspond to ring elements are @code{nil}.
@end defun
@defun ring-copy ring
This returns a new ring which is a copy of @var{ring}.
! The new ring contains the same (@code{eq}) objects as @var{ring}.
@end defun
@defun ring-empty-p ring
! This returns @code{t} if @var{ring} is empty, @code{nil} otherwise.
@end defun
! The newest element in the ring always has index 0. Higher indices
! correspond to older elements. Indices are computed modulo the ring
! length. Index @minus{}1 corresponds to the oldest element, @minus{}2
! to the next-oldest, and so forth.
@defun ring-ref ring index
This returns the object in @var{ring} found at index @var{index}.
***************
*** 1744,1750 ****
@defun ring-insert-at-beginning ring object
This inserts @var{object} into @var{ring}, treating it as the oldest
! element, and returns @var{object}.
If the ring is full, this function removes the newest element to make
room for the inserted element.
--- 1747,1753 ----
@defun ring-insert-at-beginning ring object
This inserts @var{object} into @var{ring}, treating it as the oldest
! element. The return value is not significant.
If the ring is full, this function removes the newest element to make
room for the inserted element.
============================================================
- lists.texi,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/18
- Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/18
- Re: lists.texi, David Kastrup, 2005/06/19
- Re: lists.texi, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/19
- Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/19
- Re: lists.texi, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/20
- Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/20
- Re: lists.texi, David Kastrup, 2005/06/21
- Re: lists.texi, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/21
- Re: lists.texi, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/06/21