[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: GC |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:38:16 -0400 |
> Garbage collection will happen if this percentage of the total amount of
> memory used for data has been allocated since the last garbage collection.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We talked about a percentage of the installed physical memory, not of
memory used for data.
I did not notice that difference before. Over a long Emacs session,
it may not make much difference which one we do. However, their
formula may avoid the need for the artificial upper bound that we were
talking about.
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), (continued)
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Gaƫtan LEURENT, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/28
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/18