[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities.
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities. |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:47:37 -0400 |
The problem is that try-completion and friends try to handle both
lists of symbols and anonymous lambda expressions.
Looking at the code, I don't think they do. It does not try to
handle a list of symbols--and, because of the conflict you mentioned,
it should not try.
I think we should document that a simple list of symbols is NOT
allowed, but that you can add "" as the first element to make that
list into a legitimate completion table.
Can you fix your custom thread patch to do that?
- Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/27
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities.,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/28
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/29
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/29
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Miles Bader, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/30