[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\ vs. ?\s
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: ?\ vs. ?\s |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:47:44 +0200 |
> On 6/29/05, Richard M. Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> That would be an improvement, but not a major one.
I know. Even so, "?\ " pisses me a lot.
> There are several recent bug reports that need debugging. If you
> could debug and fix a few of them, it would contribute more
> than improving these details.
I usually try to debug and fix problems I know enough about. For
example, I'm *quite* interested in receiving input (particularly your
input, as there's a legal question) about this problem with image
libraries on Windows, so I can finish the thing and get rid of it:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-06/msg00891.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-06/msg01320.html
I tend to assume that preventing crashing is important enough, even on
Windows...
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/28
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/29
Re: ?\ vs. ?\s, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/29
- Re: ?\ vs. ?\s,
Juanma Barranquero <=