[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defaults for set-variable
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Defaults for set-variable |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:29:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>> Which do you find more convenient for setting user options - setq or
>> set-variable? That is, you can use `M-: (setq foo '...)' today for user
>> options. Do you, or do you use `M-x set-variable foo ...'?
>
> I use setq.
>
> `set-variable' doesn't offer much different really. It's mainly
> useful as a gentle introduction for those who might be confused by
> lisp syntax and the presence of internal variables.
With my (rejected) support for making built-in functions
interactive, you could make `set' interactive like this:
(put 'set 'interactive
"vSet variable: \nXExpression: ")
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, (continued)
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/04
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, David Kastrup, 2005/11/04
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/05
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/11/08
- RE: Defaults for set-variable, Drew Adams, 2005/11/08
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/09
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Kim F. Storm, 2005/11/09
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/09
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/09
- Re: Defaults for set-variable, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/03
Re: Defaults for set-variable,
Kim F. Storm <=