Re: flyspell bug

[Slawomir Nowaczyk]

On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:19:32 +0100
Piet van Oostrum <address@hidden> wrote:

#> There is a bug in the current cvs version of flyspell.el (there is no
#> variable "following" in the function).

Thanks, it works better now... however, flyspell-buffer still doesn't
check all the words. In fact, it seems to miss most of them -- try the
following in this buffer:

(setq flyspell-large-region 100)
(flyspell-buffer)

This is a siimple tesst to showw how mostt words are misssed by
flyspell-buffer... not a single word is marked as misspelled in this
paragraph.

-- 
 Best wishes,
   Slawomir Nowaczyk
     ( address@hidden )

Don't wake me for the end of the world unless it has very good special effects 
-- Roger Zelazny