[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display-buffer
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: display-buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:05:39 +1300 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> >> What about the patch I'd suggested (see below)?
> >> Does it do any good?
>
> > What behaviour does this change?
>
> > I see:
>
> > A new frame takes focus and its window selected.
> > An existing frame doesn't take focus, raises and its window is not
> > selected.
>
> This is with my patch? Is it any different from the behavior without
> my patch?
No its the same or at least I can't any difference. My window manager is
metacity and it works/is configured for click-to-focus (not a lisp variable?)
However focus-follows-mouse is t, but I guess Emacs can't overrule the window
manager.
I guess generally that I would prefer the new frame not to take focus with
display-buffer (but perhaps not always). Is that possible (perhaps as an
argument or user option)?
Nick
- display-buffer, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/02
- RE: display-buffer, Drew Adams, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/03
- RE: display-buffer, Drew Adams, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: display-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/05
- Re: display-buffer, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/05
Re: display-buffer, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/03