[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:49:53 -0500 |
IIUC currently the argument passed is "vi.po" but that is not the argument
passed to operation either.
Perhaps we should fix that.
As a matter of fact I think passing
"/home/handa/x.tgz!vi.po" is more correct: if we assume that
a suitable file-name-handler is installed it's perfectly correct.
But I don't think we should install such a handler, because it would
be an incompatible change in file name syntax. And if we don't
install such a handler, the argument isn't correct at all.
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Richard Stallman, 2005/11/02
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Richard Stallman, 2005/11/09
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/09
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/10
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/11
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Kenichi Handa, 2005/11/18
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/18
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Kenichi Handa, 2005/11/18
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/19
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/11/29
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/29
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/30
- Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/19