Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming

[Lennart Borgman]

Drew Adams wrote:

> Good suggestions, all.
>  
I agree, David's points are good.

> In the present case we might use "List
> Keyboard Shortcuts (Bindings)", but that is a bit long.
>  
I would go for just "Keyboard Shortcuts". In the displayed help text it 
could say "Keyboard Shortcuts (Bindings)" or explain the terminology in 
another way. But keep the menus clean for the novice.

> Anyway, I didn't mean to distract from your suggestions. It would be good if
> some of them could be implemented before the release - in particular, adding
> top-level links to sections and moving the encoded-kbd-self-insert-ccl stuff
> to the back burner.
>  
I agree. I have found exactly the same points as David points out annoying.