[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:01:40 +0900 |
Sascha Wilde <address@hidden> writes:
> agree with Juri, that the slightly different behavior of M-# is
> extremely inconvenient. IMO this should be fixed, by making M-#
> advance to (like M-u does!).
Sounds fine to me.
> BUT, in general I think, that Emacs as a whole should be as consistent
> as possible.
Sure, consistency, in general, is good. But absolute consistency is not
necessary; sometimes it's more important to retain historical bindings,
or to favor local consistency over global consistency.
-miles
--
o The existentialist, not having a pillow, goes everywhere with the book by
Sullivan, _I am going to spit on your graves_.
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, (continued)
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/17
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Miles Bader, 2005/11/17
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Sascha Wilde, 2005/11/17
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Andreas Schwab, 2005/11/17
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/19
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Kevin Greiner, 2005/11/20
- Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/21
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/18
Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc, Juri Linkov, 2005/11/22