Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc

[David Kastrup]

Jay Belanger <address@hidden> writes:

> "Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>     For C-x <other symbol>, <other symbol> = `!', `%', `&', `*', `_', `~',
>>     `|', `\', `"', `:' or `,' might work, and some of them might be
>>     accessible without the shift key on most keyboards.  But without the
>>     extra control key, I'm not sure they're "out of the way" enough to get
>>     the green light.
>>
>> One of those might be ok.  Perhaps any of them is ok.
>> I see no particular reason to oppose the use of any of them.
>
> Okay, great.
> It looks like the only symbol listed above that is consistently
> available without a modifier key (to avoid having to change the
> modifier keys while typing the key sequence in) is the comma.
>
> Before I formally request the keybinding, are there any objections to
> using `C-x,' for `calc-dispatch'?

It's so unmnemonic.  # at least means "number".  I don't have a better
suggestion, though.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum