[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting the click position in a string
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Getting the click position in a string |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:13:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> I mean, how is one supposed to guess that "image or string" is
> actually going to be a cons?
RTFM :-)
- Function: posn-string position
Return the string object in POSITION, either `nil', or a cons cell
`(STRING . STRING-POS)'.
- Function: posn-object position
Return the image or string object in POSITION, either `nil', an
image `(image ...)', or a cons cell `(STRING . STRING-POS)'.
> Personally, I'd have expected posn-object and posn-string to just
> return the image or string, and then have a separate posn-offset or
> posn-object-pos or so that will deliver the corresponding offset _if_
> there is such a one.
>
> That would seem somewhat natural.
Maybe, but there is already too many posn- functions :-)
>
> Sorry for noticing this only now.
Don't worry. I will fix the doc strings.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Getting the click position in a string, David Kastrup, 2006/04/25
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, Kim F. Storm, 2006/04/25
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, David Kastrup, 2006/04/26
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, Kim F. Storm, 2006/04/26
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, David Kastrup, 2006/04/26
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, David Kastrup, 2006/04/26
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, David Kastrup, 2006/04/26
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/26
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, David Kastrup, 2006/04/27
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/27
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, David Kastrup, 2006/04/27
- Re: Getting the click position in a string, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/27