[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UCS-2BE
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: UCS-2BE |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:23:04 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> Juri Linkov wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing it, but I don't see the coding UCS-2BE supported
> > by Emacs (e.g. in a list of `describe-coding-system'). Is this true?
> > If yes, why not to support it?
> >
> Can Emacs (22) represent any of the characters that exist in UTF-16 but
> not UCS-2? If not, then it can just be an alias.
To my understanding, UCS-2 and UCS-4 are the names of
Character Encoding Form (CEF), not Character Encoding Scheme
(CES), and as CEF doesn't include byte serialization
mechanism, it can't be a coding system. Only CES (UTF-XXX)
can be a coding system.
But, I don't know the definition of UCS-2BE. Is it just a
limited UTF-16BE (limited to BMP)? Where is it defined
officially?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- UCS-2BE, Juri Linkov, 2006/08/30
- Re: UCS-2BE, Jason Rumney, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: UCS-2BE, Jason Rumney, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Juri Linkov, 2006/08/31
- Re: UCS-2BE, Kenichi Handa, 2006/08/31