[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug Database?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Bug Database? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:19:15 +0900 |
Frank Schmitt <address@hidden> writes:
> Which results in the fact that gdb is since years completely unusable
> for C++ programs relying on templated functions.
Well, while I'll admit that the last I looked[*] the gdb internals were
awful, unreadable, and barely maintainable code, this statement simply
isn't true.
[*] Many years ago, so take this with a grain of salt.
I spend lots of time debugging heavily templated C++ code in gdb, and
basically there are few problems (other than the canonical "optimized
code can be confusing in the debugger" issues). While debugging around
templates requires a bit of knowledge about what's actually going on,
it's no different than many other general debugging problems; you run
into minor annoyances, and you quickly find ways around them.
> So most C++ developers I know have switched to the "free as in free
> beer but not free as in free software" debugger from Sun Studio which
> in contrast to gdb works really well.
I suspect this has more to do with the sort of developers you know than
with gdb.
-Miles
--
(\(\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
- Re: Bug Database?, (continued)
- Re: Bug Database?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/19
- Re: Bug Database?, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Frank Schmitt, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Miles Bader, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Miles Bader, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Bug Database?, Giorgos Keramidas, 2006/10/20
- Re: Bug Database?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/20