[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)]
From: |
P.L.Hayes |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)] |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:48:54 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) |
Detlev Zundel <address@hidden> writes:
> Ok, attached is a patch that changes the behaviour of re-builder when
> it comes to what it previously considered empty regexps. It now
> counts words, lines and other zero-width regexps.
>
> Although I think the new behaviour is consistent in that it now also
> counts (up to its defined maximum) the numbers of characters in a
> buffer when confronted with an empty regexp (after all
> re-search-forward matches), I don't know if that is what users would
> expect.
>
> What do you think?
That patch works and (as a user) I think either that behaviour or some
message in the modeline other than "*invalid*" would've been
sufficient to preclude my earlier confusion.
Cheers,
Paul.
- address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Richard Stallman, 2007/03/06
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Oliver Scholz, 2007/03/09
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Detlev Zundel, 2007/03/09
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Richard Stallman, 2007/03/10
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Detlev Zundel, 2007/03/12
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Richard Stallman, 2007/03/12
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/13
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Richard Stallman, 2007/03/13
- Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)], Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/18
Re: address@hidden: Re: re-builder bug(s)],
P.L.Hayes <=