[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:20:15 -0400 |
> It is easy to solve that by making the file name depend on the pid
> and host name.
Which will make those buffers survive into the next session just how?
By default, only one of them can be restored. Perhaps it should
choose the one with the latest modtime.
Most people only run one Emacs. For them, this won't be an issue.
I think this is a mess asking for trouble. We are trying to patch
around a problem that comes from some default usage pattern for
single-mode single-session applications. Emacs with its multiple
major modes and kitchen-sink usefulness is just not suited to this
paradigm.
It's not that bad a mismatch.
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, (continued)
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Tassilo Horn, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Reitter, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Mathias Dahl, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Jason Rumney, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Johan Bockgård, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Tassilo Horn, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Andreas Schwab, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Jan Djärv, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Tassilo Horn, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Jan Djärv, 2007/07/18