[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:51 -0500 |
What was the problem with choosing a bug tracking system? Aren't there
any systems where you can commit changes and do other things with bug
track records just as you do for source code?
I would not be averse to using a bug-tracking system if I can operate
it by mail.
However, I don't think that recording the known bugs differently
will automatically convince people to work on fixing them.
That's the bottleneck. The same 4 or 5 bugs have been recorded
in the Emacs 22 FOR-RELEASE file for over a month. Would people
please work on fixing them?
- What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/12/30
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/30
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/30
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/12/31
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/31
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Leo, 2007/12/31
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/30