[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:37:13 -0800 |
> Well, the report is pre-21.1 and
> the change is post-21.1, so we now have a change in behaviour from a
> released version. Did anyone complain about this post 21.1?
My report was not only post-21.1; it was near the end of the Emacs 22
development cycle.
> I, for one, prefer the 21.1 behaviour for *compilation* buffers.
I have no preference for compilation buffers. My report was about grep.
> But, I can see that the change is likely better for *grep* buffers.
We agree about that.
> Perhaps *compilation* should behave differently from *grep* in this
> respect?
Agreed again. Or perhaps we could have a user option (or two).
- [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/04
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Chong Yidong, 2008/02/04
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/04
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/05
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/05
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, David Kastrup, 2008/02/06
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/06