|
From: | Vinicius Jose Latorre |
Subject: | Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap |
Date: | Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:04:02 -0200 |
I gather that Richard wanted the new functionality to use the
"whitespace" name, which makes some sense, but it seems seems to have
been done rather clumsily in some cases. E.g. the new
"whitespace-buffer" command seems completely different than the old
"whitespace-buffer" command, and really there seems no good reason for
it.
Vinicius, can you fix up these wrinkles?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |