[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: highlight failed part of isearch input
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: highlight failed part of isearch input |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:36:50 -0800 |
> >> It seems that only the tweaks that came out of the
> >> secondary discussion in this thread were applied;
> >> the original proposal was not. Here is the diff.
> >>
> >> Would someone please apply that patch, and ack?
> >
> > The patch was apparently never applied. It highlights the
> > part of your isearch input that fails to match.
>
> Did you fix all problems? I remember there were some rough edges.
As I said, it also incorporates the comments following Richard's email.
It uses a separate face from trailing-whitespace, which was Richard's
preference, but he later changed his mind and said he doesn't care whether
one face or two are used. You preferred one face, IIRC. I don't care either
way - you are welcome to change it to use a single face.
Give it a try, if you are concerned that it might not do what you want.
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input, Drew Adams, 2008/02/11
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/11
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Bastien, 2008/02/11
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/16
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/23
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input, Drew Adams, 2008/02/23
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/23
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input, Drew Adams, 2008/02/23
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/24
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input, Drew Adams, 2008/02/24
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/24
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Bastien, 2008/02/25