[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:29:24 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa wrote:
> > In article <address@hidden>, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >
>>> Should the uni-*.el files be checked in as binary? They don't appear to
>>> be utf-8 as the coding tag at the bottom claims.
>>>
> >
> > No, they encode (a kind of) binary data using Unicode
> > character codes. I used that format to minimize the file
> > sizes.
> >
> Binary data is still binary data after it has been utf-8 encoded.
I should have said that they encode a sequence of numbers
and some are greater than 255.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, (continued)
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/13
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/02/13
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/13
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/13
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/13
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/02/14
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/02/16
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/16
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/02/16
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/14
- Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el,
Kenichi Handa <=
Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/11