[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uptime.el
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: uptime.el |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:14:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> Maybe emacs-init-time (for both the variable and command names
>> to reduce confusion).
>
> I was actually thinking it might be good to rename emacs-startup-time
> to before-init-time, and add after-init-time (consistent with
> before-init-hook etc). I think it would be confusing for -time to mean
> both a time and an interval.
I agree that before-init-time and after-init-time are better for
consistency, and I also think that emacs-init-time would be consistent
with emacs-uptime regardless of the distinction between a time and
an interval.
>> But do you expect an instance of Emacs to run years (as can be reported
>> by emacs-uptime :)?
>
> Why not? That was a deliberate piece of optimism! :)
So there is the difference: optimism is to expect years in the Emacs
running time but pessimism is to expect the same in the Emacs startup
duration :)
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: uptime.el, (continued)
- Re: uptime.el, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/11
- Re: uptime.el, Francesc Rocher, 2008/02/11
- Re: uptime.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/12
- Re: uptime.el, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/12
- Re: uptime.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/14
- Re: uptime.el, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/14
- Re: uptime.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/15
- Re: uptime.el, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/15
- Re: uptime.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/15
- Re: uptime.el,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: uptime.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/16
- Re: uptime.el, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/16
- Re: uptime.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/16
- Re: uptime.el, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/16
- Re: uptime.el, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/17
- Re: uptime.el, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/17
- Re: uptime.el, Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/15