|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Why `lisp' and `shortlisp' |
Date: | Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:40:16 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> Unless it works well enough for the context of make-docfile, which is > the only place that uses it. Looks like the -d option of make-docfile > is what enables it to work. That sounds credible. Thanks, Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |